Asmat Burhan, Eza Kemal Firdaus, Septian Mirova Sebayang, Ciara O'Really, Indah Susanti, Rantiningsih Sumarni, Mesya, Vijay Kumar, Anung Ahadi Pradana, Rizki Hidayat
Despite advancements in treatment, diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are challenging to heal, and the comparative efficacy of debridement strategies is poorly understood. This study assessed the effectiveness and ranked debridement methods for DFU based on wound size reduction (WSR). We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA) of randomised trials, including individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were examined till August 2025. Seven debridement approaches were compared with each other and with standard wound care (SWC); trial arms were classified by the primary debridement method, with routine wound care co-interventions permitted. We estimated mean differences with 95% credible intervals, ranked treatments using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) (0%–100%; higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of best effect), and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Twenty-two RCTs (n = 1148) were incorporated. Biological debridement showed the largest reduction in WSR (MD 29.6%, 95% CrI −4.4 to 64.1), and enzymatic debridement (MD 21.8%, −11.5 to 55.6). Sensitivity analyses supported biological debridement over surgical and SWC, and enzymatic debridement over autolytic debridement. Across all interventions, SUCRA ranked autolytic (85%) and mechanical (75%) highest, whereas the largest estimated WSR were observed with biological and enzymatic debridement. Overall, certainty of evidence was low, although a few comparisons were rated as moderate certainty. Biological and enzymatic debridement seem to be the most successful for decreasing DFU size. However, SUCRA preferred autolytic and mechanical techniques. Evidence is scarce, endorsing personalised care and comprehensive multicenter trials. © 2026 The Wound Healing Society.
School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Banyumas, Indonesia; Study Program of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tanjungpura, Tanjungpura, Indonesia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Sahid Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia; Department of Wound, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India; College of Nursing, International PhD Program in Gerontology and Long-Term Care, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Research at a Glance
Register to unlockTopics & SDG Alignment
Register to unlockCollaboration
Register to unlockAuthor Profile (Selected)
Register to unlockReferences Overview
Register to unlockJournal & Source
Register to unlockMetadata & Integrity
Register to unlock